Clarifying user needs

I'll start by asking a clarifying question to understand what the user wants: a summary, verification, context, or an opinion? It's important to provide a bit of context, like mentioning "B费" refers to Bruno Fernandes and that talkSPORT is a UK outlet, especially during rumor season. I should also ask for permission to search the web for recent reports. I'll enumerate options for the user to respond with, and share general info about Fernandes, noting his contract details and captaincy.Presenting user options

Since this topic is beyond my current knowledge, I should respond with clear options for the user. I can suggest: 1) verifying the source and summarizing the latest updates, 2) providing context about the contract and rumors but with a disclaimer about outdated info, 3) assessing talkSPORT’s reliability and transfer rumor patterns, or 4) tracking updates based on more specifics. I can also offer to check the original talkSPORT piece, and mention that rumors should be approached cautiously. I'll ask for club and timeframe too.Crafting a concise response

I want to clarify exactly what the user needs: Do they want to verify the rumor, summarize, know the timeline, explore potential destinations, or analyze the impact if he leaves? It's important to include a note about the reliability of rumors. If they want me to verify now, I'll need their approval to search the web for confirmation. I should keep my response short and structured, using bullets and numbered options, while noting that "B费" refers to Bruno Fernandes.
你是想让我核实这条传闻,还是需要背景/影响分析?
可选帮忙方式:
说明:这类“更衣室内部感觉”表述通常可信度有限,需看是否有独立、细节充足的二次来源。若你同意,我可以现在就检索并给出结论与要点摘要。
